Don’t Re-invent
Community Paramedicine, There’s no time!
By Alan Perry
September 25, 2013
It baffles me that the issues of community paramedicine,
integrated healthcare and implementation of the EMS agenda for the future are
still not resolved. Here we are, less than 30 days from major portions of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) being implemented, with most
agencies having no clue how they will be affected and how/if they are going to
make any changes. We have got to start thinking outside the box (pun intended).
As we gather to meet and discuss these eventualities we need to stop trying to
re-invent the whole process every time. There is a large body of work already
completed working programs in place by nearly every variety of EMS system and free
money to make it all happen. Duplication of effort is never a good idea, we must
learn quickly to take the good work already done and apply it to what we are
doing, or need to be doing.
Here’s the problem, the PPACA does not specify how medical
care will be provided it only specifies the desired outcome and the penalties
for not achieving the “triple aim”. So everyone involved in the process,
especially those with the most to gain or lose, are moving aggressively to
develop programs with little consideration on the effect on EMS services. The
EMS community apparently does not feel threatened by this, much like our apathy
about the recommendations of the EMS agenda for the future we think we have all
the time in the world and that our federal or state officials will tell us how
to proceed. I can tell you now that the Federal and State officials tasked with
oversight of EMS don’t have a plan. The hour is growing very short; we are
approaching a point where we will have to transition from being proactive to
being reactive.
The best publication I have found so far is from the
National Consensus Conference on Community Paramedicine, the meeting in October
of 2012 produced an excellent summary of how a program should work that can be
easily tailored and implemented incrementally by any EMS service. I am aware
that the National EMS Advisory Council (NEMSAC), State offices of EMS, Local
EMS councils and individuals are also working on their own plans, expending
great amounts of time and effort to go through the same process already
completed by acknowledged experts. Why? I suspect part of the problem is that
it is not a priority. EMS still takes a back seat to other emergency services
in many locales. Those tasked with this project may not have funding, and
although grants may be available it may not be a priority for the senior
administration.
Any program of this type must go through some necessary
developmental steps that don’t necessarily need to occur in a chronological
order. While you are obtaining the data to quantify the problem you can also be
developing a general selection and training program for your providers, having
dialog with the other stakeholders and creating your grant requests, and
building the infrastructure to support it. This is possible because of the
large body of work already completed and some known variables for your program.
We must be seen by our healthcare partners, the public and policy makers to be
taking positive steps to move our systems forward toward improving outcomes,
reducing costs and improving the overall healthcare experience.
Acknowledge the quality of the work already done, use it,
build upon it, and modify it. Build upon this foundation of what will be a new
way of doing business, embracing the goals of the EMS agenda for the future and
the PPACA. They are defining what we do and what the public needs and expects
from us.
References:
Patterson DG, Skillman SM. National Consensus Conference on Community Paramedicine: Summary of a
Expert Meeting. Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University
of Washington; Feb 2013.
DOT, HHS. Innovation
Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services: A Draft White Paper. NEMSAC,
July 2013.
Goodwin J, Finding a
New Seat at the Healthcare Table, Best Pactices in Emergency Medical
Services, Vol. 16, No. 7, July 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment