Sunday, January 14, 2018

Agenda 2050 transparency question


Good morning, 

I attended the first Agenda 2050 meeting in Silver Spring. Since then I have been curious about the comments submitted by my peers about this project. I am unable to find any documentation or summary of those comments. As they are essential to the development of this Agenda, is there a plan for, or an already existing repository for them? As a suggestion, it might be useful to create an unbiased survey to document the responses to your questions in a transparent and open way so all can benefit from the experience.


Thank you,

Comments on the revised EMS 2050 Straw Man

Responses to the EMS Agenda 2050
revised Straw Man Document

Alan Perry
1/14/2018


What is your vision for ems in 2050, and how do we get there?
I think we must all first recognize that my vision for my organization and myself, in my socio-political environment, will likely be entirely different from the vision of another. The reality is that this Nation is made up of individual states, cities, towns and communities with vastly different resources and needs. I don't view that as a negative as the authors of this document seem to believe. EMS, as I believe we should call it, has evolved with, and adapted to, this diverse landscape. The larger changes to the healthcare system brought about by tort law and the affordable care act have pushed primary care relationships between physicians and patients to a new low. As a result EMS has been compelled to fill the void, a cycle this document will perpetuate. We have not yet achieved the goals of the original EMS agenda and should be working to close those gaps while recognizing the professionalism of those who choose this profession with greater support and recognition.

Will the vision and guiding principles in the straw man help steer the ems profession in the right direction?
It would be more like a hard left, socialized medicine to be specific. The hard-line on "social equality", which I believe EMS has always striven to achieve, seems very much like redistribution of resources. The reality is that each community can choose now what level of EMS services that want, need and can afford. This seems like a segway for the Federal government to gain greater control over the healthcare system and EMS.  The document does contain some positive ideas for preserving and promoting the workforce that are long overdue relative to hours, compensation and safety. But ideas are just that, without a clear mechanism to overcome outside influence, tradition and politics, it cannot be achieved. The document condemns volunteers outright and recommends their replacement with paid staff that most rural communities cannot afford. This will necessitate either redistribution of resources or new taxes to fund those positions.

Integrated and Seamless
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve the vision? What is missing that must be included?

Integration with the rest of the healthcare system has been a long standing need. In a monolithic organizational environment that can be easily achieved. In communities where several different hospital systems and EMS agencies operate it becomes much more complex. In the meeting I attended I noted that no hospital or healthcare system administrators where present. What is missing are the stakeholders.

Socially Equitable
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve this vision? What is missing that must be included?

I believe each citizen, community, city & state should be free to choose where they live, what taxes they will be subject to, what level of EMS service they desire and how they choose to staff and fund it. Redistribution of wealth and resources is a game in which the losers will be taxpayers, providers and patients. EMS in my experience has always provided the best service possible with the resources available without bias.

Inherently Safe
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve the vision? What is missing that must be included?

I suggest that it is impossible to make an emergency inherently safe. The predominant injury pattern for EMS providers are back and extremity injuries secondary to lifting and moving patients. The very nature of the EMS environment necessitates manual lifting and moving of patients in some circumstances. To the greatest extent possible mechanical devices such as powered stretchers and loading systems must be employed. This is not yet a universal occurrence, it should be a priority until it is through enforcement of existing OSHA guidelines and availability of grants to fund up-fitting these devices. There are many cultural barriers to achieving inherent safety as well, many organizations still require "lights and sirens" responses even though the practice has no proven benefit.
  
Sustainable and Efficient
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve the vision? What is missing that must be included?

Provider compensation, as well as professional recognition are key factors to creating a committed, professional, mobile and long-term workforce. Public education is also a frequently overlooked/neglected component. Both of these require significant cultural change in the way the provider and the public are viewed by EMS administrators. The keystone in all this is funding, who will pay for it?

Reliable and Prepared
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve the vision? What is missing that must be included?

Fire-based EMS and third service EMS are usually the most reliable, but volunteer systems are more scaleable when disasters strike (yet this document seeks to abolish them).  Evidence-based practices are quickly becoming the norm already, its the hospital systems that are lagging. This section itself is a little redundant as these subjects are closely related to system efficiency. The idea of permitting EMS provides to function across the hospital/pre-hospital divide is a good one, but once again where are the stakeholders that can make that happen?

Adaptable and Innovative
Which recommendations are most important or won't help achieve the vision? What is missing that must be included?


The ideas put forth in this document regarding education across the EMS spectrum, including leadership and administration are all good ones, as is the concept of both educating providers in and funding research in EMS. The authors must consider the diversity of organization types, and the significant obstacles and resistance that entrenched systems such as the fire service will have to this type of change. Leaders and administrators in these organizations are typically promoted from within without regard for any specific training or expertise in EMS.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

What is the Agenda?

What is the Agenda?

By Alan Perry
September 27, 2017

The first regional meeting for The EMS Agenda 2050 to discuss the Straw Man Document created by a panel of subject matter experts (SME’s)was held on September 26, 2017 in Silver Spring Maryland. The EMS Agenda 2050 is very public and intended to be as inclusive as possible, literally anyone can provide comment on the Straw Man Document or the process by e-mailing mtaigman@redflashgroup.com .

The meeting structure was different; there were about 12 tables with seating for 6-8 at each table with one moderator per table.  Each table would convene for 25-30 minutes to discuss the future of EMS based on a specific question related to the “guiding principles” identified by the SME’s (who served as the moderators). The SME’s would then record any new ideas that seemed viable to them. I do not claim to have heard all the ideas or discussions, but I believe I was able to sit with nearly everyone that attended at some point. Most who attended where EMS chief officers, EMS industry writers, government officials both state and federal, VAOEMS, HHS, NHTSA, DHS, DOT, industry representatives from the IAFF, NAEMSE, consulting firms and EMS educators. It is notable who was not there; there were no representatives there from allied health professions, legislators, the hospital systems, insurers or Medicare/Medicaid.

The keynote speaker was Dr. Ric Martinez, one of the authors of the 1996 EMS Agenda for the future, who made some points to get us thinking. To paraphrase his comments, he asserts that EMS is fragmented and suffers from the ill effects of isolation and insulation. He notes that EMS is deployed locally while Fire is deployed nationally. That EMS should be declared an essential public service, that we need the think exponentially not incrementally. It was a short but effective inspiration.

The subject of social equity appeared in many of the early questions asked of the groups, initially was not concerning until it became the predominant theme in the round of questions we worked through that morning. In its normal context that would imply that there was some concern about the equity of the treatment of patients, that was not the case. The concern was refined via feedback from the moderators which seemed to make it more of a concern about disparity among EMS systems affecting entire populations falling inside differing EMS systems that have developed locally.

We were repeatedly asked to think about how we would see the future of EMS if all the boundaries and restrictions did not exist, some of us have a hard time with that, but after a few practice sessions even an old paramedic can become creative. Rather than describe each individual workgroup, the question and reaction, I will try to describe the ideas that seemed to bridge all the questions and which became better refined because of their resonance as the exercise progressed.

Integration- The vision includes the ability to treat more patients where they are found or to transport them to the most appropriate resource to improve care, reduce cost and improve resource utilization. EMS must have better integration with the rest of the healthcare system, public health, mental health and social services if it is to meet this agenda goal. It includes sharing access to patient records and treatment plans to guide care, removing artificial boundaries limiting where providers may practice and where patients may be treated.  The most significant barrier appears to be communication and a willingness of the identified partners to engage in a meaningful way without some inducement. 

Education- The vision involves placing paramedics and other providers with higher levels of education into the mix to assist in filling the gap between hospital and pre-hospital care. It suggests greater public involvement which will have a public education component. The integration component will require education of those we wish to integrate with as well as legislatures and insurers.  It also addresses changes to the core material taught in paramedic level programs to include healthcare management, research, injury prevention, and the development of paramedic post-graduation programs. At every point in the discussions it became more evident that EMS will be used to fill a gap in the healthcare system left by the exit of the traditional family doctor. Paramedic education and practice would evolve to the level of the physician extender or nurse practitioner. Public education came up in almost all discussions as a way to improve public reaction and involvement in healthcare events.

Technology/Innovation- This was the most interesting and amusing of the topics covered, participants came up with ideas as frightening and wonderful as implantable chips to identify and hold patient healthcare data, monitor lab values, and provide other biometric data to healthcare providers. PSAP, dispatch, patient and hospital communications systems that could function as easily as a smart phone and provide real-time audio, video and biometric data to call takers, responders and receiving facilities to guide response, size-up, treatment and transport decisions in real time. Defibrillators that fit in your pocket. High-Tech lightweight bulletproof, puncture proof, thermally resistant PPE with built in biometrics. Drone technology dispatched with units to give advanced 360 scene size-ups & patient assessment. Use of AI to assist or autonomously respond to, assess, monitor, treat and transport patients more consistently and safely. Use of live universal standards of care based on the most current evidence.

Workforce retention and development-  There was quite a bit of discussion surrounding the workforce, the various levels of care, the considerations for paid, volunteer and fire-based systems, and the effect of higher education standards on an already stressed system. Most acknowledge that burnout, long hours and low pay are factors in retaining people and preventing EMS from being a viable career path for most. To place EMS on par with other healthcare professions there must be transparency about the career, established career paths, progressive education programs from EMT-PhD, professional recognition and better wages, benefits, resources and working conditions.

System development /Sustainability- Understanding that EMS is a separate essential public service like the Fire service, Police or public education could be a pathway to resolve funding concerns and bring diverse systems across the nation into agreement on what minimum level of service and standard of care is acceptable without limiting the localities in their freedom to choose the design and make-up of the service. Encourage innovation, eliminate that which does not add value and self-inflicted obstacles like tradition. Understand your data and use it to find and demonstrate value, tie performance to requests for resources. Address top management stagnation with use of term limits, requalification or selection every few years instead of lifetime positions.


Closing

The parties with the largest influence on the outcome are not present. For any real integration to occur this must change, if it does not the effort will be severely limited and we will revert to the highly localized solutions we are familiar with.

Higher education, better technology, wages & deployment of all the suggested improvements will take investment. Most systems already struggle with funding, the first things to be cut are the very things the agenda seeks to implement, how can that be fixed? EMS will be asked to fill the gap left in healthcare with no means to achieve it if major legislative or economic pressure is not brought to bear to correct funding gaps. If EMS is identified as an essential public service with minimum standards of service and care defined, as with Fire Service or Public Education, or if EMS service can be scored like the Fire Service for insurance purposes, it will create the political and economic pressure necessary.

This exercise appears to be driven by Federal agency concerns to encourage collaboration borne out of the ACA. The ACA encourages the development of Accountable Care Organizations (ACO’s) and ties reimbursement levels to performance of the system. It seems that this mechanism left out any collaboration with EMS or we would have seen the ACO’s (hospital systems) in the room ready to talk.

Public education programs such as those employed by the Fire Service have had a profound positive effect. Fire losses were once a grave concern for the nation prior to Fire Service public education programs and fire codes. The decline in fire related losses and deaths dramatically declined. This is a lesson EMS has been slow to learn, spending a fraction of the resources up front on public education can save big on the service delivery end. It is the best way to improve public health and be responsible with the resources we have.

I got concerned when I heard from several groups that volunteer systems were an obstacle to progress and promptly set them straight. EMS in the United States came to be largely by volunteer systems that arose to address the need. The fact is that most of the United States is served by volunteer firefighters and EMS personnel. It is a great and valuable tradition in this nation, one I will not seek to discourage. Involving the public in the solution is also key to improving our situation whether encouraging volunteerism or simply providing the public education to allow the public to participate as a partner or better understand what we do.

Good luck,